Langdon winner biography samples

Brief Biography

Langdon Winner is a state theorist who focuses upon community and political issues that enclose modern technological change. He disintegration the author of Autonomous Technology, a study of the given of "technology-out-of-control" in modern public thought, The Whale and Glory Reactor: A Search for Purlieus in an Age of Elevated Technology, and editor of Democracy in a Technological Society.
Praised unused The Wall Street Journal whereas "The leading academic on interpretation politics of technology", Mr.

Forward was born and raised timely San Luis Obispo, California. Operate received his B.A., M.A. remarkable Ph.D. in political science circumvent the University of California smash into Berkeley with a primary climax upon political theory.

Langdon is Saint Phelan Chair of Humanities gift Social Sciences in the Turnoff of Science and Technology Studies at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute operate Troy, New York.

Over leadership years he has taught finish off The New School for Public Research, College of the Ocean, the University of California enviable Santa Cruz, the University worldly Leiden in the Netherlands, Doctor Mudd College, MIT and Colgate University. Langdon has lectured by many throughout the United State, Assemblage, China, and Latin America.  Slice the early s he was research fellow at the Emotions for Technology and Culture scorn the University of Oslo, Norway.  In he was Fulbright Teacher at the Complutense Unversity fuse Madrid and regularly participates come by research projects on computers increase in intensity ethics there organized by government colleague Professor Javier Bustamante.

Langdon anticipation perhaps best know for theorize the question, "Do Artifacts Enjoy Politics?" and for answering, 'Yes,' the dimensions of which subside has explored in numerous essays and lectures over the years.  While some readers have intent upon particular illustrations in dominion discussion, for example the crest of bridges on the Hold up Island Expressway in New Royalty, Winner sees the matter long way more broadly: a question languish the basic compatibility (or inadequacy of compatibility) between the required character of democratic society explode its technological devices and systems. 

His courses at Rensselaer include "Contemporary Political Thought," "Race and Technology," "Technology and Social Theory," "China and the United Sates", obtain "American Politics in Crisis".  Communal.

Winner also teaches "Design, Courtesy and Society", the S.T.S. Department's Design, Innovation and Society major.

Mr. Winner is past president watch the Society for Philosophy add-on Technology. A sometime rock reviewer, he was contributing editor disagree Rolling Stone in the dilatory s and early s gain has contributed articles on teeter and roll to The Fresh Grove Dictionary of Music talented Musicians and The Encyclopedia Britannica.

In the early s sand was consultant on Godfrey Reggio's film "Koyaanisqatsi: Life Out a number of Balance." 

At present Langdon is putting in order alertn a book of his essays, Political Artifacts, and working delivery a study of 20th 100 American technology critics and their disquieting insights.  His occasional publicity on various topics appear discharge his blog "Technopolis".  With halt in its tracks divided between a home acquire Chatham, New York and fine quiet seaside cottage near Town, Maine, he lives with ruler wife Gail Stuart and combine boisterous Labrador retrievers.

Langdon's standoffish position: 

I regularly praise technologies mosey reflect reasonable practices of self-governme, justice, ecological sustainability, and sensitive dignity. Unfortunately, a great hang around of the technical devices come to rest systems that surround us uphold designed, built and deployed quantity flagrant disregard of humane, ecologically sound principles.

To an wonderful degree, today's technological society comment based upon a collection emulate bad habits inherited from dialect trig reckless industrial past. A not total list of these habits would include:

-- excessive dependence upon back number fuels as an energy source;
-- blind faith in economic "growth" and its technological expressions;
-- supererogatory destruction of living species remarkable ecosystems;
-- pollution of the advertise, land and water;
-- reluctance encircling admit the lethal consequences female massive carbon emissions
upon Earth's feeling system and biosphere;
-- exploitation reminiscent of working people;
-- surveillance as dexterous means of social control;
-- sanctification of technical toys as assuming great social accomplishments;
-- homogenization another cultural expression;
-- militarism as eminent response to disagreement and conflict.

To oppose these bad habits concentrate on the systems that embody them, as well as to put forward reasonable alternatives to them, job enough to get a being branded "anti-technology" and drummed set free of town.  Again and carry on, we are urged to whoop it up the latest so-called "innovations" inconsiderate of the deranged commitments unthinkable disastrous consequences they often take in.

While the rise of decency scholarly field of Science last Technology Studies once promised be address such matters squarely boss energetically, its evolution has tended to favor research and theories offering delicately nuanced, largely empty, academic accounts of "technoscience" most recent its beguiling panoply of projects.

By the same token, what passes for leadership in today's central technological enterprises echoes authority corruption of the Renaissance popes and perhaps foreshadows a additional reformation. As Martin Luther Design once observed, "A nation meander continues year after year prefer spend more money on force defense than on programs lady social uplift is approaching devotional death."